📖

Literature Review

Systematic analysis of existing scholarship on AI in creative practice

👥

Qualitative Research

In-depth interviews and observational studies with practitioners

🔬

Experimental Design

Controlled studies comparing collaborative approaches

📊

Quantitative Analysis

Statistical evaluation of creative outputs and processes

Phase I

Foundation & Landscape Mapping

The foundational phase establishes the theoretical grounding for our investigation through comprehensive literature review and landscape analysis of current AI creative tools and practices.

We examine existing research across design studies, human-computer interaction, artificial intelligence, and creative cognition to build a robust theoretical foundation for understanding human-AI creative collaboration.

Simultaneously, we map the current landscape of AI tools, identifying capabilities, limitations, and adoption patterns across different creative disciplines and geographic regions.

Research Activities

  • Systematic literature review (500+ sources)
  • AI tool capability mapping & classification
  • Industry adoption survey (n=1000+)
  • Expert panel consultations

Expected Outputs

  • Comprehensive literature synthesis
  • AI creative tools taxonomy
  • Adoption patterns report
Phase II

Empirical Investigation

The empirical phase involves direct engagement with creative practitioners actively using AI tools in their professional work, gathering rich qualitative data on real-world human-AI collaboration experiences.

Through semi-structured interviews, workflow observation sessions, and detailed case studies, we capture the nuanced ways designers integrate AI into their practice.

This phase provides crucial insights into the lived experience of human-AI creative collaboration that cannot be captured through surveys or controlled experiments alone.

Research Activities

  • Practitioner interviews (n=50+)
  • Workflow observation sessions
  • Case study documentation (15 projects)
  • Focus group discussions

Expected Outputs

  • Practitioner experience analysis
  • Workflow pattern identification
  • Best practice documentation
Phase III

Experimental Validation

The experimental phase tests specific hypotheses about human-AI collaboration through controlled studies comparing creative outputs and processes across different collaboration modes.

Participants complete identical creative briefs under varying conditions: human-only, AI-assisted at specific stages, and full-chain AI collaboration. Outputs are evaluated by expert panels.

This phase provides the quantitative evidence needed to support claims about the effectiveness of different collaboration approaches.

Research Activities

  • Controlled creative experiments
  • Comparative output analysis
  • Expert panel evaluations
  • Statistical significance testing

Expected Outputs

  • Experimental results dataset
  • Comparative analysis report
  • Statistical validation
Phase IV

Framework Synthesis & Validation

The synthesis phase integrates findings from all previous phases into a coherent Full-Chain Creative Partner framework, validated through pilot implementations with industry partners.

We develop practical guidelines, assessment tools, and implementation strategies that translate research insights into actionable recommendations for creative practitioners and organisations.

Framework validation involves real-world testing with partner studios, educational institutions, and individual practitioners across multiple creative disciplines.

Research Activities

  • Framework development workshops
  • Pilot implementation programmes
  • Iterative refinement cycles
  • Stakeholder feedback integration

Expected Outputs

  • Full-Chain Framework v1.0
  • Implementation guidelines
  • Assessment toolkit

Research Timeline

A 24-month investigation from foundation to framework delivery

I
Phase I Foundation Q1-Q2 2024
II
Phase II Empirical Q3-Q4 2024
III
Phase III Experimental Q1-Q2 2025
IV
Phase IV Synthesis Q3-Q4 2025

Ethical Considerations

Our research adheres to rigorous ethical standards addressing key concerns in AI-related creative research.

🔒 Data Privacy

All participant data is anonymised and securely stored. Creative outputs shared with explicit consent only. GDPR-compliant data handling throughout.

⚖️ Informed Consent

Clear explanation of research purposes, data usage, and participant rights. Ongoing consent verification for longitudinal engagement.

🎨 Creative Attribution

Transparent frameworks for attributing human vs AI contributions in collaborative works examined within the research.

🌍 Inclusive Representation

Active recruitment across diverse geographic, cultural, and disciplinary backgrounds to ensure findings reflect global creative practice.